This legislation includes the State Financial Administration Organic Law (Ley Law regarding the General Norms of the Government (Ley Organica. LEY N° “LEY DE BASES DE LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS ADMINISTRATIVOS QUE RIGEN LOS ACTOS DE LOS ORGANOS DE LA. Banco Central Articulo 1. La Administración del Estado estará constituida por los Ministerios, las Intendencias, las Gobernaciones y.

Author: Guzilkree Kizragore
Country: Philippines
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 24 April 2015
Pages: 437
PDF File Size: 8.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 18.30 Mb
ISBN: 877-7-62751-570-5
Downloads: 52858
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Vudobei

A few buses stopped in the middle of Alameda and the driver and passengers observed the unusual spectacle in astonishment. Is he domiciled at Ahumadaas the petitioners maintain?

A review panel, misleadingly called an appeals court, may be called on to reconsider the rejection of a film following the presentation of a written appeal. Censorship also extends to video cassettes and to films shown on television. These bills did not pass, since the government decided instead to incorporate many of their norms chie amendments to the main statute governing public administration.

ley de probidad chile pdf

International human rights standards permit restrictions on freedom of expression and access to information when secret information is involved that may affect national security. Its decision is final and may not be reviewed by a court of law.

We discovered that the same old ladies and a few retired men always turned up, because they had more time. International norms protect freedom chle expression and information for everyone regardless of lej status or attributions. Conservative opinion, especially in the Senate, still opposes the reform.

Despite what appears to be an increasing consensus for the abolition of prior censorship, an amendment to Article 19 12 of the constitution tabled bythe government in the Chamber of Deputies in April has not progressed, and at the time of writing August Congress has still to vote on the issue.

The council also is mandated to enforce the law by supervising cinemas. The judges declared that it was “manifestly without basis” and ruled it inadmissable.

The functions of the CCC are not subject to any judicial control or oversight. Point 3 of the declaration stated: He is awoken from his seductive fantasy and finds chie once more on the cross. In common with other countries with an inquisitorial judicial process, Chilean legislation does not allow the public access to the evidence gathered in the early stages of a criminal inquiry.


These include Article of the Penal Code, which prohibits public officials from revealing secrets or confidential documents, regardless of the intention or effect of the revelation; the Code of Military Justice, which imposes even harsher penalties on personnel who disregard the military code of silence on institutional matters; Article 74 Bis B of the Criminal Procedure Code, which prohibits the police from divulging information about criminal inquiries in progress; Article 19 2 of the Law on Abuses of Publicity which prohibits unauthorized disclosure in the media of secret “measures, agreements or officials documents disposiciones, acuerdos o documentos oficialesor secret documents which form part of a criminal investigation, a norm which goes back to ; 95 and Article 25 of the same law, which allows judges to prohibit the publication of any information about criminal investigations in progress.

Furthermore, the constitutional provision extends not only to films but also to film advertising, such as posters and trailers, and has been interpreted as applicable to videos as well. On June 17, the Supreme Court unanimously upheld the verdict on appeal, making the ban definitive.

Currently, however, courts continue to impose reporting restrictions. Rights Limited to Journalists. Although the images and message of the film might be found disturbing or offensive by some people, the Chilean constitution does not protect people from this. The judges evaded their responsibility toreconcile the rival claims of freedom of expression and the principle of honor by establishing, on legal argument, where their limits lay in the case before them.

Nevertheless, since these are administrative rulings of a public body, film classifications may be subject to later review and amendment by that body if in the public interest. The traditional bias in public administration toward secrecy can be seen in an array of statutes that make it a criminal offense to reveal or publish official information deemed confidential by government officials. In essence, the verdict was a theological disquisition on the nobility and divinity of Christ, backed by meticulous quotations from encyclopedias and religious historians.


It was impossible to discern on what grounds the ban on Bilbao had been maintained, since neither film was intended for commercial exhibition and both were of obvious cultural interest. They consider that the need for transparency and openness in public administration is an integral part of a governmental campaign against corruption, which is seen as a priority 81575 all political sectors.


By accepting that the film offended the honor of Christ, the judgment opened the door to the prohibition of any work critical of the orthodox view of figures who are worshiped or widely venerated.

If Christ is a person invested with legal rights, does he also have legal obligations? An Undemocratic Body in Democracy. Civil rights lawyers, however, stressed to Human Rights Watch that chils new legislation needed to be tested over time and jurisprudence favoring the right to access consolidated step by step.

To do so would transgress its own principles of pluralism which do not allow the suppression of divergent opinion. Civil liberties groups in Chile, however, have expressed concern that the “proper functioning” of the institution or office concerned is likely to be interpreted expansively by officials as a basis for denying information, 1857 could be difficult to challenge in court. At the time of this writing FebruaryAfani was still facing trial proceedings.

The writ was unanimously rejected by the Santiago Appeals Court, but an appeal is currently before the Supreme Court. Prior censorship of the cinema is mandated in the constitution of The European Court of Human Rights has held that “protection of journalistic sources is one of the basic conditions for press freedom,” and that mandatory disclosure is unacceptable unless “justified by an overriding requirement in the public interest.

The protection of sources from which journalists derive information is considered in legal systems across the world to be a mainstay of press freedom.

Judges abused it repeatedly during the military government, and all political parties as well as press institutions, have harshly criticized it. Leyy Last Temptation verdict has two other disturbing implications.